Why Speak?
Speak is an introduction to act. Actions have to be justified by clear reasons.
Since the Saracen conquests of Syria, Phoenicia, Palestine, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Armenia, Assyria, Chaldea and Anatolia a pattern can be observed in these lands: the native population (Christians, Jews, Samaritans, Zoroastrians and Mandeans) was and is still on the verge of extinction.
Surely this happens in all conquests. People are massacred and sometimes totally annihilated. But not all times. Many times conquered peoples are assimilated with the conquerors or the other way. What is happening on the lands conquered by Muslims is similar to what has happened before and after, but there is something different in it.
Unlike other conquerors Muslims have defined plans and reasons for their conquests. Their relation with the conquered peoples is determined by laws already practiced by their prophet Muhammad. They know what they are doing and they are doing it for a specific purpose.
In these lands, a diversity of peoples, Christians in their majority, has to deal with conquerors holding the same mentality. Whether Arabs, Berbers, Persians, Turks, Kurds, Albanians or Bosnians, all follow the same or similar principles governing their relation with the conquered peoples, the infidels.
What has befell on the conquered natives?
1. Many were killed. This happened in AD 634 and after. This happened also in many of the conflicts between Muslims where the natives fell pray to the warring sides. It happened during the Crusades. It happened in 1860 in Mt Lebanon and Damascus. It happened in 1915 in Anatolia. It happened in 1920 in Anatolia. It happened in Assyria in 1933. It happened several times in Lebanon between 1975 and 1990. It is happening now in Iraq and Egypt. It is happening also in Lebanon where the leaders of the Christians are all under the threat of death and some were murdered in 2005 and 2006, last of whom two days ago was Pierre Gemayel.
2. Many converted to Islam although Islam has always been the monopoly of Arabs, Turks, Berbers, Kurds and Persians.
3. Many since AD 634 have been fleeing the lands of their ancestors. Others were deported. This is the pattern in Lebanon now.
This is a brief review of events about which it will take pages to write about. What has been characterizing these events is that two defined parties are identifiable: Muslims (servants and followers of Allah) and Infidels (Christians, Jews etc.).
Another important pattern should be noticed: some of these infidels decided to resist Jihad. Their resistance now is the cause of many of the conflicts which we have been witnessing and are still witnessing in these lands.
The Christians of Mt Lebanon were among the first to resist the yoke of Islam. Later, they united with the Druzes successfully forming the state of Lebanon.
Others were less successful. The Armenians and Assyrians were massacred for trying to resist. The Greeks were deported to prevent them from reclaiming the lands of their ancestors.
Others were less fortunate. The Copts are stuck in Egypt as anybody stuck in a pit with no air.
Since the Saracen conquests of Syria, Phoenicia, Palestine, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Armenia, Assyria, Chaldea and Anatolia a pattern can be observed in these lands: the native population (Christians, Jews, Samaritans, Zoroastrians and Mandeans) was and is still on the verge of extinction.
Surely this happens in all conquests. People are massacred and sometimes totally annihilated. But not all times. Many times conquered peoples are assimilated with the conquerors or the other way. What is happening on the lands conquered by Muslims is similar to what has happened before and after, but there is something different in it.
Unlike other conquerors Muslims have defined plans and reasons for their conquests. Their relation with the conquered peoples is determined by laws already practiced by their prophet Muhammad. They know what they are doing and they are doing it for a specific purpose.
In these lands, a diversity of peoples, Christians in their majority, has to deal with conquerors holding the same mentality. Whether Arabs, Berbers, Persians, Turks, Kurds, Albanians or Bosnians, all follow the same or similar principles governing their relation with the conquered peoples, the infidels.
What has befell on the conquered natives?
1. Many were killed. This happened in AD 634 and after. This happened also in many of the conflicts between Muslims where the natives fell pray to the warring sides. It happened during the Crusades. It happened in 1860 in Mt Lebanon and Damascus. It happened in 1915 in Anatolia. It happened in 1920 in Anatolia. It happened in Assyria in 1933. It happened several times in Lebanon between 1975 and 1990. It is happening now in Iraq and Egypt. It is happening also in Lebanon where the leaders of the Christians are all under the threat of death and some were murdered in 2005 and 2006, last of whom two days ago was Pierre Gemayel.
2. Many converted to Islam although Islam has always been the monopoly of Arabs, Turks, Berbers, Kurds and Persians.
3. Many since AD 634 have been fleeing the lands of their ancestors. Others were deported. This is the pattern in Lebanon now.
This is a brief review of events about which it will take pages to write about. What has been characterizing these events is that two defined parties are identifiable: Muslims (servants and followers of Allah) and Infidels (Christians, Jews etc.).
Another important pattern should be noticed: some of these infidels decided to resist Jihad. Their resistance now is the cause of many of the conflicts which we have been witnessing and are still witnessing in these lands.
The Christians of Mt Lebanon were among the first to resist the yoke of Islam. Later, they united with the Druzes successfully forming the state of Lebanon.
Others were less successful. The Armenians and Assyrians were massacred for trying to resist. The Greeks were deported to prevent them from reclaiming the lands of their ancestors.
Others were less fortunate. The Copts are stuck in Egypt as anybody stuck in a pit with no air.
